Effective March 20, 2024: New Flood Hazard Disclosure Requirements on New Jersey Property Sellers and Landlords
As previously reported, a new statute concerning real property and flood notifications in New Jersey was enacted on July 3, 2023. The new law, which amends the New Jersey Truth-in-Renting Act (P.L. 2001, c.313) and supplements the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act (NJCFA) (P.L. 1960, c.39), applies to the sale and exchange of all residential and commercial property, as well as to all residential and commercial lease transactions, with certain exceptions. Effective March 20, 2024, New Jersey law now requires that all sellers of commercial or residential real property and all landlords entering into or renewing any commercial or residential leases disclose, in writing, the below enumerated flood risk information with respect to the subject property. New Seller Flood Disclosure Requirements For sales, the statute supplements the NJCFA, to require all sellers of real property to disclose, on the Property Condition Disclosure Statement (the “Disclosure Statement”) promulgated by the New Jersey Department of Community Affairs, whether the property is located in the FEMA Special or Moderate Risk Flood Hazard Area and any actual knowledge of the seller concerning flood risks of the property. The Disclosure Statement’s relevant flood disclosures are listed as questions 109-117. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 56:8-19.2, all sellers of real property, regardless of whether such property is residential or commercial, must answer the flood risk questions on the Disclosure Statement prior to a purchaser becoming obligated to purchase the property by contract:
New Landlord Flood Disclosure Requirements The following flood hazard disclosures must be made by the landlord before the lease signing or renewal and may be made either within the lease or by attaching a separate Flood Risk Notice:
The term “landlord” is defined by the statute as any person who rents or leases, for a term of at least one month, commercial space or residential dwelling units (excluding dwelling units in a premises containing not more than two such units, and an owner-occupied premises of not more than three dwelling units, and hotels, motels, and other guest houses serving transient or seasonal guests (defined as those who rent a property for a period of less than 120 days)). Potential Ramifications of Non-compliance Leases In addition to fines of up to $100 for each violation of the Truth-in-Renting Act, if a landlord fails to disclose that the property is located in the FEMA Special or Moderate Risk Flood Hazard Area, and a tenant subsequently becomes aware that the property is located in those areas, a tenant has a right to terminate the lease. In addition, the tenant may pursue all legal remedies if flooding occurs that: (1) results in damage to the tenant’s personal property; (2) affects the habitability of the leased premises; or (3) affects access to the leased premises. Sales The statute does not include express remedies available to a purchaser if a seller breaches its disclosure duties under the statute. However, as mentioned, the statute supplements the NJCFA. A willful, knowing, or reckless violation of the NJCFA could result in penalties of up to $10,000 for the first offense and up to $20,000 for each additional offense under an enforcement action commenced by the New Jersey Attorney General’s Office. A seller could also be liable for treble (triple) damages and reasonable attorney fees and costs if a buyer decides to bring a civil lawsuit. Courts have ruled that not every advertisement or sale of real estate falls within the scope of the NJCFA and have declined to impose the NJCFA remedies on the “non-professional, casual seller of real estate,” albeit without expressly defining those terms. Notwithstanding the recognized limited construction of the NJCFA’s applicability to real estate transactions, the New Jersey Supreme Court has held that “the policies of New Jersey’s consumer fraud act apply to commercial sellers of real estate and brokers engaged in such transactions.” Zaman v. Felton, 219 N.J. 199, 223 (2014). In sum, the unresolved conflict between the language of the NJCFA, which appears to relate to all sales and advertising of real estate, and the recognition of the New Jersey Supreme Court that the NJCFA is to be given a “limited construction” when applied to commercial real estate transactions, leaves many open questions relative to the ramifications for sellers who fail to make the new flood disclosures. Conclusion Sellers, landlords, and lenders should all consult with counsel to ensure compliance and avoid running afoul of these stringent disclosure requirements. |